> > > > Can you point to some meeting minutes or other material where > > > > EAP/DHCP was evaluated against the other solutions and > > got into the > > > > liaison letter? That background would help IETF to understand if > > > > EAP/DHCP is justified, at all... > > > > > > Am afraid that the meeting minutes are published/accessible to DSLF > > > members, and it's not within my authority to circulate them > > - I guess > > > it would require a decision by the DSLF to do so. > > > > OK. Please at least give a pointer so that those who have > > access to DSLF website know where to look for the caption of > > relevant discussions. > > Here's the link to the DSL Forum's contribution page (it requires an > active login account): > http://www.dslforum.org/bin/c5i?mid=4&rid=4&s1=6 > > The page also features a search tool, which allows finding the minutes > of meetings, besides the contributions themselves
Thanks. I found the meeting minutes in DSLForum2007-611, "Minutes of the Architecture and Transport meeting Nashville 2007". I didn't see any discussion around an analysis of PANA and 802.1X in comparison to DHCP-auth. Further reading the dsl2007.554.02 contribution I realize the only proposal on the table that was being considered was DHCP-auth. Apparently IEEE did not respond to earlier liaison. And IETF had not either. When IETF had received the liaison letter with the requirements, we should have responded to that. In the absence of that response, it seems like DHCP-auth filled the space and led to the latest liaison letter. Again, if I missed any discussion that explicitly analyzed and ruled out other alternatives, please let me know. But otherwise, I don't get the impression that all proposals received sufficient attention (and IETF is to blame for that partially, given the silence to the earlier liaison letter). Anyhow, we just need to analyze all the proposals and let DSLF know about them. Alper > > -Woj. > > > > > Alper > > > > > > > > > That said, the DSLF has > > > issued previous liaison statements to the IETF on the topic on more > > > than one occasion... > > > > > > -Woj. > > > > > > > > > > > Alper > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
