With all due respect, I'm questioning this result ;-) The client/server paradigm which, at least to me, does not really require IPv6.
In my opinion the real dooms day metric is "how far we are from the IP addressable cell phone", which is probably not measurable :-/ Millions of cell phones will receive incoming calls to their fixed IP address. This is only possible with IPv6. But if the IETF has not yet decided that IP-layer mobility is THE mobility solution, then there is a problem. Regards, pars On Dec 12, 2007 5:24 PM, Joe Touch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a good overall datapoint: > http://utility.nokia.net/~lars/meter/ipv6.html > > Lars and I talked originally about a 'doomsday clock'-like metric, that > shows IPv6 uptake via tracking Fortune-500 and similar commercial sites. > This is the current result... not very encouraging, IMO. > > Joe > > > Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > On 12 dec 2007, at 16:46, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > > > >> I wanted to say that while I'm happy to see more and more IPv6 > >> addresses allocated and - right this evening - my home being invaded > >> by 2^64 addresses by my provider, I also think many if not all new > >> paradigm applications aren't IPv6 but IPv4: facebook, itunes, gps, > >> skype, fon, second life, you name it. > > > > Small datapoint: iTunes supports IPv6 on both Mac and Windows and has > > for a number of years. I don't believe any Apple hosted stuff, such as > > the iTunes Store, is available over IPv6, though. > > > > Iljitsch > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Int-area mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
