On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:17:45AM +0100, Tomasz Lis wrote: > The recently introduced patch changed behavior of masks when > the bit number is negative. Instead of no bits set, the new way > makes all bits set. Problematic patch: > drm/i915: Avoid BIT(max) - 1 and use GENMASK(max - 1, 0) > > This behaviour was not considered when making changes, and boundary > value of count (=0) is now resulting in a mask with all bits on, since > the value is directly decreased and therefore negative. Checking if > all bits are set leads to infinite loop. > > This patch introduces an additional check to avoid empty masks. It > reverts the control flow to the exact same way it worked before > the problematic patch. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz....@intel.com>
Change commit tile to "drm/i915/fbdev: Proper support of boundary". Other than that: Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com> -- Cheers, Arek _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
