On ma, 2017-02-20 at 10:00 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Tomasz Lis <tomasz....@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The recently introduced patch changed behavior of masks when
> > the bit number is negative. Instead of no bits set, the new way
> > makes all bits set. Problematic patch:
> > drm/i915: Avoid BIT(max) - 1 and use GENMASK(max - 1, 0)
>
> For future reference, please find the commit id of the committed patch,
> and reference that with the Fixes: tag. Please Cc the folks from the
> commit.
>
> Whoever commits this must add:
>
> Fixes: 3c779a49bd7c ("drm/i915: Avoid BIT(max) - 1 and use GENMASK(max - 1,
> 0)")
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Joonas, Chris, please check the rest of the regressing commit that it
> doesn't suffer from the same issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Jani.
This line was actually rest of the commit. So all good, thanks for
catching this.
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
