Quoting Jani Nikula (2025-10-15 11:46:52-03:00)
>On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, Gustavo Sousa <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Starting with Xe3p_LPD, we now have a new field in MEM_SS_INFO_GLOBAL
>> that indicates whether the memory has enabled ECC that limits display
>> bandwidth.  Add the field ecc_impacting_de to struct dram_info to
>> contain that information and set it appropriately when probing for
>> memory info.  We will use that field when updating bandwidth parameters
>> for Xe3p_LPD.
>
>Could the field name be more accurate than "ecc impacting de"? It sounds
>quite handwavy to me.

Well, perhaps the innacurate part would be the generic "de" instead of
something that refers to the bandwidth?

If so, would you be fine with ecc_impacting_bandwidth?

--
Gustavo Sousa

>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>>
>> Bspec: 69131
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h       | 1 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c | 4 ++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.h | 1 +
>>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 354ef75ef6a5..5bf3b4ab2baa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -1233,6 +1233,7 @@
>>  #define   OROM_OFFSET_MASK                        REG_GENMASK(20, 16)
>>  
>>  #define MTL_MEM_SS_INFO_GLOBAL                        _MMIO(0x45700)
>> +#define   XE3P_ECC_IMPACTING_DE                        REG_BIT(12)
>>  #define   MTL_N_OF_ENABLED_QGV_POINTS_MASK        REG_GENMASK(11, 8)
>>  #define   MTL_N_OF_POPULATED_CH_MASK                REG_GENMASK(7, 4)
>>  #define   MTL_DDR_TYPE_MASK                        REG_GENMASK(3, 0)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> index 8841cfe1cac8..bf9f8e38d6ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> @@ -685,6 +685,7 @@ static int gen12_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *i915, struct dram_info *
>>  
>>  static int xelpdp_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct 
>> dram_info *dram_info)
>>  {
>> +        struct intel_display *display = i915->display;
>>          u32 val = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore, MTL_MEM_SS_INFO_GLOBAL);
>>  
>>          switch (REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_DDR_TYPE_MASK, val)) {
>> @@ -723,6 +724,9 @@ static int xelpdp_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *i915, struct dram_info
>>          dram_info->num_qgv_points = 
>> REG_FIELD_GET(MTL_N_OF_ENABLED_QGV_POINTS_MASK, val);
>>          /* PSF GV points not supported in D14+ */
>>  
>> +        if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 35)
>> +                dram_info->ecc_impacting_de = 
>> REG_FIELD_GET(XE3P_ECC_IMPACTING_DE, val);
>> +
>>          return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.h
>> index 03a973f1c941..ac77f1ab409f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct dram_info {
>>          u8 num_channels;
>>          u8 num_qgv_points;
>>          u8 num_psf_gv_points;
>> +        bool ecc_impacting_de; /* Only valid from Xe3p_LPD onward. */
>>          bool symmetric_memory;
>>          bool has_16gb_dimms;
>>  };
>
>-- 
>Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to