On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:50:30AM -0700, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> In null/golden context there are multiple state commands where
> the actual state is always zero. For more compact batch representation
> add a macro which just emits command and the rest of the state as zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.c    | 12 ++++++++++++
>  tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.h    |  6 +++++-
>  tools/null_state_gen/intel_null_state_gen.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.c 
> b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.c
> index 2a0b340..6e86aef 100644
> --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.c
> +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.c
> @@ -274,3 +274,15 @@ const char *intel_batch_type_as_str(const struct bb_item 
> *item)
>  
>       return "UNKNOWN";
>  }
> +
> +void intel_batch_cmd_emit_null(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, const int 
> cmd, const int len, const char *str)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     assert(len > 1);
> +
> +     bb_area_emit(batch->cmds, (cmd | (len - 2)), CMD, str);

I'm a little hesitant about the (len - 2) here just because there are
a number of commands for which those bits are not the length field, and
one or two where the length field is (len - 1). I think we're unlikely
to use those commands in a null batch, so maybe it's not something to
worry about.

> +
> +     for (i = 1; i < len; i++)
> +             OUT_BATCH(0);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.h 
> b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.h
> index e44c5c9..b4eed25 100644
> --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.h
> +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_batchbuffer.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>  #include <stdint.h>
>  
>  #define MAX_RELOCS 64
> -#define MAX_ITEMS 4096
> +#define MAX_ITEMS 1024
>  #define MAX_STRLEN 256
>  
>  #define ALIGN(x, y) (((x) + (y)-1) & ~((y)-1))
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct intel_batchbuffer {
>  
>  struct intel_batchbuffer *intel_batchbuffer_create(void);
>  
> +#define OUT_CMD(cmd, len) intel_batch_cmd_emit_null(batch, cmd, len, #cmd " 
> " #len)
>  #define OUT_BATCH(d) bb_area_emit(batch->cmds, d, CMD, #d)
>  #define OUT_BATCH_STATE_OFFSET(d) bb_area_emit(batch->cmds, d, STATE_OFFSET, 
> #d)
>  #define OUT_RELOC(batch, read_domain, write_domain, d) 
> bb_area_emit(batch->cmds, d, RELOC, #d)
> @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ uint32_t intel_batch_state_copy(struct intel_batchbuffer 
> *batch, void *d, unsign
>                               const char *name);
>  uint32_t intel_batch_state_alloc(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, unsigned 
> bytes, unsigned align,
>                                const char *name);
> +uint32_t intel_batch_state_offset(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, unsigned 
> align);

I see that at least patch 2 uses this function outside of intel_batchbuffer.c
but I wasn't expecting this change based on the commit title or message.

Thanks,
Brad

>  
>  unsigned intel_batch_num_cmds(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch);
>  
> @@ -94,4 +96,6 @@ const char *intel_batch_type_as_str(const struct bb_item 
> *item);
>  void bb_area_emit(struct bb_area *a, uint32_t dword, item_type type, const 
> char *str);
>  void bb_area_emit_offset(struct bb_area *a, unsigned i, uint32_t dword, 
> item_type type, const char *str);
>  
> +void intel_batch_cmd_emit_null(struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, const int 
> cmd, const int len, const char *str);
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_null_state_gen.c 
> b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_null_state_gen.c
> index b337706..a7eb22b 100644
> --- a/tools/null_state_gen/intel_null_state_gen.c
> +++ b/tools/null_state_gen/intel_null_state_gen.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ static void print_usage(char *s)
>  static int print_state(int gen, struct intel_batchbuffer *batch)
>  {
>       int i;
> +     unsigned long cmds;
> +
> +     fprintf(stderr, "Generating for gen%d\n", gen);
>  
>       printf("#include \"intel_renderstate.h\"\n\n");
>  
> @@ -43,8 +46,10 @@ static int print_state(int gen, struct intel_batchbuffer 
> *batch)
>                       printf("\t /* 0x%08x %s '%s' */", i * 4,
>                              intel_batch_type_as_str(cmd), cmd->str);
>  
> -             if (i * 4 == batch->cmds_end_offset)
> +             if (i * 4 == batch->cmds_end_offset) {
> +                     cmds = i + 1;
>                       printf("\t /* cmds end */");
> +             }
>  
>               if (intel_batch_is_reloc(batch, i))
>                       printf("\t /* reloc */");
> @@ -60,6 +65,11 @@ static int print_state(int gen, struct intel_batchbuffer 
> *batch)
>  
>       printf("};\n\nRO_RENDERSTATE(%d);\n", gen);
>  
> +     fprintf(stderr, "Commands %lu (%lu bytes)\n", cmds, cmds * 4);
> +     fprintf(stderr, "State    %lu (%lu bytes)\n", batch->state->num_items, 
> batch->state->num_items * 4);
> +     fprintf(stderr, "Total    %lu (%lu bytes)\n", batch->cmds->num_items, 
> batch->cmds->num_items * 4);
> +     fprintf(stderr, "\n");
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to