On 02.07.2015 21:22, Edward Sutton wrote:
On Jul 2, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Igor Mironchik <igor.mironc...@gmail.com
<mailto:igor.mironc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 02.07.2015 18:07, Bob Hood wrote:
On 7/2/2015 8:44 AM, Igor Mironchik wrote:
On 02.07.2015 17:21, Daniel França wrote:
>> This news sounds like a good week for Xamarin
Indeed
Stop guys...
No, they have a valid point. I had not even heard about Xamarin
until they posted this, and after looking, it looks like Xamarin is
a legitimate competitor to what the Qt Company intended with its
Indie license.
Ok, Xamarin is cheaper than Qt. But with Xamarin and C# you can write
crosspaltform only business logic. All UI is platform dependend and
you should write UI for iOS, UI for Android, and so on. With Qt you
can write once and deploy everywhere…
That is not an accurate statement about Xamarin. You do *not* have to
write the UI in native code an longer.
They have a cross-platform UI library now and are claiming 90% common
code across platforms. Cross-platform UI *was* one of the reasons I
went with Qt 5.x.
http://xamarin.com/forms
I have not used Xamarin. It is certainly interesting.
I told about Xamarin.iOS & Xamarin.Android. You have to write different
code for iOS and Android if you need something interesting... With
Xamarin.Forms you can write UI crossplatform, but only very simple UI,
when with Qt you can write everything crossplatform...
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
