On 3/21/21 12:11 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Jason H wrote:

I anticipate that 5.15 will require a doubly long LTS period as a
result.
Unfortunately we learnt here that 5.15 will not have any LTS period
at all, at least not one that matters for the Open Source world.

This is, basically, the end of Qt (considering Qt 6 probably won’t
be entering Debian either, at least not with the current maintainers).

bye,
//mirabilos

You know, I made that prediction back in February. It was followed by a chortle

=====

Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt 6 Ubuntu package

On 31/1/21 12:09 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:

If history repeats itself, and in the software industry it most
definitely does, requiring a login to obtain the OpenSource code
effectively ended OpenSource Qt.

really?
I guess maybe 'git clonehttp://code.qt.io/qt/qt5.git'
is a bit too much to ask for open source developers to type.

=====

That chortle was followed by a Guffaw.

=====

05.02.2021, 12:32, "Lorn Potter" <lorn.pot...@gmail.com>:
On 31/1/21 12:09 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:
  If history repeats itself, and in the software industry it most
  definitely does, requiring a login to obtain the OpenSource code
  effectively ended OpenSource Qt.
really?
I guess maybe 'git clonehttp://code.qt.io/qt/qt5.git'
is a bit too much to ask for open source developers to type.
Or https://download.qt.io/archive/qt/.

=====

I concur. Qt OpenSource is basically dead. That was the intent of all the moves. It's time for DVorak to pull out the keyboard and write an essay on Qt.

https://dvorak.org/whatever/

Without a maintainer it will either disappear from the Debian flock within a year or it will become like that Juffed editor that seems to be a zombie in all the repos. If you install it your Qt build environment and other Qt based applications break. Even with that, the thing usually won't open and edit something. Last updated in 2013 on SourceForge.

https://sourceforge.net/projects/juffed/

Still found in almost every Debian based repo. Been breaking things bad for years.

KDE will then be forced out of the Debian repos as well or just stay in whatever state it is with no distro actually supporting KDE desktop.

If you need slightly newer Qt, Manjaro has slightly newer Qt stuff. You just won't be able to build a Debian package or have your code run many places unless you are going to package the Qt libraries with your application.

As Jason said, nobody is targeting Qt 6.

The industrial control, set-top box, and medical device market that has already left have been telling me they aren't coming back. Why would they? Been too much pain over the past couple of years. Too many methods just disappearing without even asking the market if they are in use.

What was it? About 25 years? Not a bad run for software. Clipper only made it 12.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_(programming_language)

Everything the market is telling me now though is that Qt is headed off for the Commodore Amiga and WordsStar realm. Small group of really rabid fans.

For many the last straw was what Jason pointed out. Qt 6 was shoved out the door to chase license revenue no matter the condition of it.

--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to