Hi all,
> On Feb 15, 2020, at 02:01, Larry Garfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ... is this proposal intended to supplant HttpFoundation and PSR-7 ... ?
This is question is answered in the RFC introduction; quoting from there:
The SQLite “about” page says, “Think of SQLite not as a replacement
for Oracle but as a replacement for fopen().”
https://www.sqlite.org/about.html
Likewise, think of this RFC not as a replacement for HttpFoundation
or PSR-7, or as a model of HTTP messages, but as an object-oriented
alternative to superglobals, header(), setcookie(), setrawcookie(),
and so on.
> PDO was mentioned previously as a model.
I did not mention PDO as "a model". I mentioned PDO (along with other
extensions) to illustrate a counter-argument to objections based on the
availability and comparability of userland implementations. The
counter-argument summary was:
That's not to say "because PDO was allowed into core, this RFC must
therefore be allowed into core" but to say "those objections alone
were not a barrier to PDO, so they alone should not be a barrier to
this RFC".
The argument, and my counter-argument, are here:
<https://externals.io/message/108436#108493>
--
Paul M. Jones
[email protected]
http://paul-m-jones.com
Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
https://leanpub.com/sn1php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
