This would make PHP more consistent. Please add this! On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, at 12:32 PM, Guilliam Xavier wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:31 PM Jakob Givoni <ja...@givoni.dk> wrote: > > > > Hi Rowan, > > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 4:01 PM Rowan Tommins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > While I'd personally be fine with this change, I think we should > > > understand why the previous proposal failed rather than just hoping the > > > vote goes differently this time. > > > > I think you have a good point here. > > I've only been around for a short time so I can't comment on historical > > reasons. > > And though I agree the proposal is logical and consistent, I have this > > nagging feeling in the back of my brain: > > Are we encouraging functions with long lists of parameters so that > > they need to be on their own lines? > > Just to say, with descriptive names and type declarations (and now > union types), even a method with just two or three parameters can need > to be wrapped to keep lines below 120 characters ;) Maybe the RFC > could include an example? > > But I am curious too about why it failed last time. > > -- > Guilliam Xavier > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
