Hey All Am 19.07.21 um 17:02 schrieb Andreas Heigl: > Hey All > > Am 19.07.21 um 16:34 schrieb Levi Morrison via internals: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:38 AM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:48 PM Tobias Nyholm <tobias.nyh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey. >>>> I would like to get karma to be able to vote on RFCs. I understand that >>>> voting karma isn’t usually given out to people who write their first >>>> mailing list entry. >>>> >>>> But I do believe I qualify as “Lead developers of PHP based projects >>>> (frameworks, cms, tools, etc.)” >>> >>> Hey Tobias, >>> >>> My response here is basically the same as the last time the topic came up: >>> https://externals.io/message/110936#110937 Voting is just the very last >>> step of the RFC process, at which point the proposal can no longer be >>> influenced. If you have feedback about a proposal based on your extensive >>> experience in PHP's open source ecosystem, then the discussion phase is the >>> time to provide it, while it can still influence the proposal, as well as >>> other people's view of the proposal. >> >> I second this. >> >>> At least in my personal opinion, I think it's important that people granted >>> voting rights as community representatives have at least some historical >>> involvement in RFC discussions. >> >> I agree with this, but have no specific objection to granting Tobias >> voting karma, as this is underspecified; how long should they >> participate? What kinds of involvement are appropriate? Being >> underspecified is not really their fault, and I don't feel like it >> would be an abuse to grant them voting karma, but do think it would be >> an abuse to deny them voting karma indefinitely because "we" don't get >> around to specifying it. It should be less of a decision on a >> case-by-case basis and more of a checklist. >> > > Sounds like we need an RFC to make it clearer how voting karma for the > RFC process will be granted in the future.
I have created a draft for an RFC to implement future rules for granting voting karma. If you want to contribute to that, feel free to open a PR against it[1]. To be able to make the future karma grants more trnasparent this needs input from everyone: Opponoents as well as proponents! I'm looking forward to a fruitful conversation and to a great RFC that can move us to more transparency. Cheers Andreas [1] https://github.com/heiglandreas/rfc/blob/main/implement_future_rules_for_granting_voting_karma.md -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andr...@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | https://andreas.heigl.org | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
