10 days of radio silence? What's going on? anyway benchmarks (countsey of bench.sh ) of the server/bandwidth
-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870 @ 2.40GHz CPU Cores : 40 @ 2524.597 MHz CPU Cache : 30720 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 393.6 GB (48.7 GB Used) Total Mem : 125.9 GB (12.0 GB Used) Total Swap : 8.0 GB (0 Used) System uptime : 10 days, 2 hour 11 min Load average : 40.18, 40.10, 40.13 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-122-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : Dedicated Organization : AS31798 DataCity Location : Kitchener / CA Region : Ontario ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 812 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 841 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 821 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 824.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 941.15 Mbps 829.87 Mbps 3.09 ms Los Angeles, US 937.01 Mbps 903.15 Mbps 64.21 ms Dallas, US 941.23 Mbps 898.69 Mbps 36.36 ms Montreal, CA 888.80 Mbps 916.91 Mbps 11.09 ms Paris, FR 886.36 Mbps 820.77 Mbps 90.50 ms Amsterdam, NL 854.88 Mbps 770.73 Mbps 98.16 ms Shanghai, CN 426.16 Mbps 833.23 Mbps 216.21 ms Nanjing, CN 439.53 Mbps 542.91 Mbps 198.60 ms Seoul, KR 465.37 Mbps 367.20 Mbps 216.88 ms Singapore, SG 417.93 Mbps 132.76 Mbps 212.71 ms Tokyo, JP 668.62 Mbps 676.35 Mbps 134.48 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 35 sec Timestamp : 2022-07-22 21:35:37 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - it incorrectly says 393GB because of partitioning, it's actually 1TB - I've intentionally disabled Hyperthreading because... in my opinion/experience, hyperthreading implementations in older Intel CPUs often did more harm than good, making the cpus run hotter and clock lower, this is a (high-end) 2011 model. (I have the opposite experience with AMD SMT fwiw) On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 01:18, Hans Henrik Bergan <divinit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Fwiw Chris Haas / vendiadvertising.com has reached out, they're willing > to sponsor raid(1) if my proposal is accepted. > Haas is reading this mailing list, but does not wish to participate/post > directly at present. > (I have no prior relation, never heard of them before today) > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 22:31, Hans Henrik Bergan <divinit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> i have a 40-core 128GB RAM server with 1 (and only 1) static ipv4 address >> that I intend to keep around until at least 27 november 2025 (but unsure >> after that), >> it has more RAM/CPU than i need, and i could set up a virtual machine on >> it and give VNC access to the VM in the form of >> > ssh -L 9999:localhost:3389 user@ip >> then point a RDP/VNC client to localhost:9999 >> i can dedicate individual TCP ports to it, but not any of 22, 80, 443, >> 5900, 5901, 8083, 9999, 587, 2525 >> (after which i can recommend Teamviewer for a more comfortable access) >> >> but the server has several caveats: >> - it's un-raided, rolling just a single 1TB SSD, if that SSD was to die, >> everything on it would be lost, and it would probably take days to replace >> the drive. >> - it's located in a somewhat unstable environment, occasional power >> outage, it was out on 30 june, 23 june, 27 january, and in 2021 was down on >> 30 august. (it boots up and recovers automatically, but it has a reboot >> time of roughly 300 seconds until ssh responds again) >> - I can not offer a dedicated IP (but can offer some dedicated ports) >> - May be decommissioned after 27-11-2025 >> >> If that sounds like a good idea, I'll want a ssh public key. >> >> >> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 15:38, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> >> wrote: >> >>> On 11.07.2022 at 21:04, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote: >>> >>> > Any of you windows.php.net guys familiar with SSH? Can one be created? >>> >>> That would be possible (needed to be set-up by Alex Schoenmaker), but >>> while that could solve the upload issue, it wouldn't solve the other >>> issue I've mentioned, namely that we need to avoid dynamically linking >>> against incompatible versions of dependencies. And there is yet another >>> issue, namely security. I think these issues can only be solved by some >>> central place where the packages are build. >>> >>> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 19:52, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> On 11.07.2022 at 18:53, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Is there any SSH public key associated with the Windows php >>> developers? >>> >> Or >>> >>> with CMB? >>> >> >>> >> No. At least not regarding windows.php.net. >>> >> >>> >>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:25, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de >>> > >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 11.07.2022 at 17:41, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Do you mean it is unlikely that Github Actions will suffice? >>> because >>> >> that >>> >>>>> would definitely be a great solution if it was possible/feasible . >>> >>>> >>> >>>> No. It is only unlikely that automated uploads to window.php.net >>> will >>> >>>> ever be possible using GH actions. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Anyway, with regards to "I don't think there are special >>> requirements >>> >>>>> regarding the hardware", can you give a rough estimate on RAM/disk >>> >> space >>> >>>>> requirements? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> The old machine had something like 4 or 8 GB RAM, and a 128 GB hard >>> >> disk. >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>>
