On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:17, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > A 3 way up-down vote doesn't make sense. What happens if none of the 3 > options reaches 66%? > > The viable options here are a single RCV vote (which we've done before), or a > single "Should we do this" vote that requires 66%, followed by a "when should > we do this" vote with 2 options, majority wins. > > --Larry Garfield
Does this work for you guys? ===== Proposed Voting Choices ===== ### 1. Enhancement of Precision: Float Arguments for Sub-Second Precision **Should we extend `sleep()` to accept floats for sub-second delays?** - Yes - No **Which PHP version should implement this feature if accepted?** - 8.4 - 9.0 ### 2. Normalized Return Values on Windows **Should we modify `sleep()` on Windows for consistent return values?** - Yes - No **Which PHP version should implement this feature if accepted?** - 8.4 - 9.0 ### 3. Enhanced Return Value Precision **Should we increase `sleep()` return value precision to include fractions of a second?** - Yes - No **Which PHP version should implement this feature if accepted?** - 8.4 - 9.0 @Tim >adding a short *nix explanation of when sleep will return earlier than expected would be helpful Where should that be? in the "Introduction" section? or the "Proposal" section? (or elsewhere?)
