Sent from my iPhone > On 23 Apr 2024, at 22:35, Bilge <bi...@scriptfusion.com> wrote: > On 23/04/2024 10:25, Stephen Reay wrote: >> The argument that "Client" is meaningless becomes pretty moot when you >> realise that you can import a *namespace* and use it relatively, if you so >> wish: >> ``` >> import MyLib\HTTP; >> $a = new HTTP\Client(...); >> ``` > > Hi Stephen, > > Granted, but I also believe the user can and should have the reasonable > expectation that they can work comfortably (without conflicts or aliases) > using leaf (class) names exclusively. > > Kind regards, > Bilge
I'm sorry but I think you've missed the entire point of namespaces if you want class names to all be universally unique without their namespace component. The referenced RFC gives clear examples of how a class with a prefix would be converted to a namespace and class.
