> > On Jun 27, 2024 at 3:26 AM, <Stephen Reay (mailto:php-li...@koalephant.com)> > wrote: > > > > I think I understand your view: you're not as concerned with consistency if > the alternative is something "better". > > > That yes, but more importantly, that deciding NOT to disallow calling `static` methods on `abstract static` classes is a decision for the ages that cannot be reversed later because of BC. And with that, I think we've both beaten this horse to death so I am over and out on this topic. -Mike
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Bilge
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Stephen Reay
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Tim Düsterhus
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Mike Schinkel
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Mike Schinkel
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Stephen Reay
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Mike Schinkel
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Stephen Reay
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Mike Schinkel
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Stephen Reay
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Mike Schinkel
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Tim Düsterhus
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Bilge
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Tim Düsterhus
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Mike Schinkel
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Bilge
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Jordi Boggiano
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Bilge
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Bilge
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Jordi Boggiano
- Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Static class Alex Wells