I've said it twice in the past few days, but I guess with the flurry
of messages you've missed it.
I think it would be useful for the functionality inside the date
extension to go in, but it cannot go in as class date & class
timezone. These two classes need to be renamed if they are to go in
and I've proposed 2 different naming conventions just a few e-mails
ago. Perhaps if you were to vote on the names or second (or is it
3rd) Pierre' s proposal to shelf date until future releases we can
bring this discussion to some sort of a conclusion.
On 18-Jul-06, at 6:50 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Edin,
Ilia is th eRelease Master, so in PHP he is the list as we do
not have
any acepted public list whatsoever. Again i don#t agree on that
but still
it served us all. And if I know it and Steph knows it and even has
it in
the weeklies, how come you still say we're all liars?
I can producre IRC logs where Ilia says he never meant to include
the date class without further discussion and certanly not under
that name. But since he is on the list here, perhaps it is the best
that he exmplains.
And I only called one person lier. Other people got things wrong.
There was *never* a 5.2 TODO item that said date class was to be re-
enabled. And this's a fact whether you like it or not.
Edin
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia Alshanetsky
