Hello Edin, it is nice to get you back on track on formalism now that it suits you. (Hint inheritance rules and bla bla). However we never had any way of any formalized todo we actually cared for. If you look up the todo's most close to a release of any prior version you'll find out two things. First todo's have not been met and second most things dones apart from bugfixes have been done after some mailings or without any public decision what so ever. That does not mean that i favor it but it is indeed the php way and we all lived good without having to much formalisms like (you call me a java guy anyway :-) JSR's. Nonetheless the particular thing in question has been decided, whether we agree or not, whether we like it or not and especially regardless of any later outcome. The decision was done and a pure timing problem made us (from my perspective lucky decision) not do it in 5.2.
All that nonsense above said. I just would like to see that we agree on having an official todo thing like lukas' site. Actually we should do that on php.net somewhere and have a selected group get cvs access right to that and have changes mailed to internals@ so that people have a place to discuss any decisions.... best regards marcus Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 7:45:23 PM, you wrote: > Steph Fox wrote: >>> Steph Fox wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Do we really like it in 5.2? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It was originally on the 5_2 TODO. >>> >>> >>> Where? Never seen it. Heard Derick lie to people about it a few times. >> >> >> http://www.zend.com/zend/week/week287.php#Heading2 > So your statemetn from above is false. It has never been on PHP 5.2 > TODO. Zend weeklies are something completely different, wouldn't you agree? > Edin Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
