While PHP implementation of namespaces is may not be 100% of what
people consider to be namespaces it is close enough and I think the
name "namespaces" is most appropriate and clear cut. We don't call
PHP objects "Zend Objects" or some other strange name, I don't see
why namespaces should be any different IMHO.
On 17-Aug-07, at 11:06 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
Oh dear. I thought the general feeling was to stick with namespaces?
On 17/08/07, Johannes Schlüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've updated the patch to be compatible with Dmitry's latest changes:
http://schlueters.de/~johannes/php/
zend_namespace_to_package_20070817.diff
johannes
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 11:26 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
I think we reached the consensus to rename namespaces to packages
as our
implementation is more package-like. Therefore I wrote the
corresponding
patch which tries to get rid of all "namespaces" and "ns" (well,
not all
"ns" only the namespace-related ones of course) used in the code.
Additionally I changed all package-tests. Any objections?
Does anybody (with the move-on-CVS-server powers) care about the
history
of the tests? Then please cp ZendEngine2/tests/ns_* to pkg_*
there else
I'll do a simple cvs rm and cvs add.
The patch is at
http://schlueters.de/~johannes/php/zend_namespace_to_package.diff
and
the tarball with the changed tests at
http://schlueters.de/~johannes/php/zend_package_tests.tar.bz2
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
-----
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?
c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
