On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > > > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe we just should put it in cvs then? Then we won't have this > > > > issue and other people can test it more easily as well. > > > > > > The only problem with that is what if people get bad > > > benchmarks/results and we want to pull it out? It kind of defeats > > > the purpose to do this in a more structured way. Want us to commit > > > it to a branch? PHP 5.2.x? > > > > Neither of those solve the merging issues, so no, not to a branch or > > 5.2. It should just go to HEAD and PHP_5_3. *If* it seems to be > > really bad, we can always revert it later. > > Uhm I meant 5.3. I guess we can commit it but as you know, reverting > this kind of stuff later is a headache people don't like doing.
Life's not always easy ;-) regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
