Hi: On 23 Dec 2011, at 01:14, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> BTW, which languages you are talking about? PHP peers - Python, Ruby, Perl, > Javascript (to some measure), etc. don't have typing as far as I know. > Comparing PHP to statically compiled strictly typed languages does not seem > very useful to me. So could you clarify what do you mean? Perhaps the newest kid on the block deserves some reference for making optional typing more mainstream and being more radical about being checkable documentation: http://www.dartlang.org/docs/technical-overview/index.html Dart's type system is not sound, and the design goal is to never (NEVER) interfere with execution semantics. It is more radical than previous research systems with its not-sound approach of making generics understandable, but people seem to appreciate that in practice. It might give the necessary example to bridge the worlds between the 'PHP should be more like Java' and the 'PHP should be more like PHP' people. Best regards Stefan -- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
