On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Christopher Jones <christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 01/24/2012 03:11 PM, Justin Martin wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> With some frequency, I find bugs which are not "bogus", so much as they >> are reported based on a misunderstanding. Usually this happens for >> documentation problems, where someone has misunderstood what the >> documentation says, or hasn't read the documentation >> thoroughly enough. >> >> I'd like to propose simply changing the term "bogus" to "not-bug". This >> would more politely and clearly indicate the nature of the way the bug is >> being closed, in addition to the comment that one ordinarily leaves. >> >> Those I've spoken to in php.doc agree. Any objections? >> >> Thank you, >> Justin Martin >> > > I'm +1 on this. It's time for a new, more collaborative approach.
Sure, I'll +1 on this. The "bogus" implies "RTFM, bitch", which isn't professional at all :-) > > Chris > > -- > Email: christopher.jo...@oracle.com > Tel: +1 650 506 8630 > Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
