2012/4/24 Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> > That's a good point, it should say the PHP tokenizer, or something to > that effect (folks who spend more time with the internals could say > better what to call it). >
Hmm yeah I guess that wording is a bit sloppy, isn't it? I'm not sure what the "proper" terminology would be there. Any suggestions? > > The major difference from his previous version of the RFC is his > addition of the .phpf format, which would allow including a .php file > with <?php and ?> in it from a .phpf file, but would not allow or need > any usage of <?php and ?> within the .phpf file itself. > Partially correct. That is the only practical difference, but I also added clarifying language based on concerns raised here. For example, I added a section clarifying that the references to a file extension are merely a convention and do not represent a new parsing method based on filename. I also added clarifications on how script inclusion would work vs. direct access via URL on a webserver. > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Arvids Godjuks > <arvids.godj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As far as I read there is no difference from the previous RFC - it > > says essentially the same. > > > > " The <?php tag, contained within one of these files, tells the webserver > > to, in essence, "switch to PHP mode" and start parsing the data as PHP > code. > > When the ?> tag is reached, the webserver "switches back" and resumes > > parsing it as HTML. If no tags are given, the webserver will parse the > file > > data as HTML code until a <?php tag is reached. " > > > > I'm I the only one who thinks that this is just plain wrong? I know for a > > fact that there is no "PHP mode" on the WEB server level. I think I > > understand what it tries to say, but I totally disagree with what is > > written and don't want to guess anything. > > > > 24 апреля 2012 г. 22:52 пользователь Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com > >написал: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I finally found some time today to update the RFC based on discussions > >> here. Please have a look and let me know if I missed anything or if > >> there's anything else that needs clarifying: > >> > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpp > >> > >> > >> I also want to know if this is sufficient to satisfy some of the > concerns > >> that have been raised about being able to implement this into existing > >> frameworks that use a more "tangled" architecture. > >> > >> Thanks! =) > >> > >> --Kris > >> > > > > -- > Tom Boutell > P'unk Avenue > 215 755 1330 > punkave.com > window.punkave.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
