-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >
> > Just a thought - if the main argument is about syntax - we can > propose few versions (Without implementing them) and then vote for > 1) No annotations (attributes) at all. 2) Syntax #1 3) Syntax #2 > and so on. > > What do you think? > If we come up with two bad ideas, it's not a reason to shred annotations altogether. ;) Alternative wording: 1) Syntax #1 2) Syntax #2 ... n) Syntax #n n+1) None of these - do nothing until we get better proposals. - -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer Tel.: +49-170-6381563 Mail: l...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDvSa8ACgkQCs1dsHJ/X7Ct/ACgx2PD/Pk4DDnFGC8QSq75K2J/ 8i8An0IXRxebk3663Y1rZaoZN+Fr5m6b =k2Bt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
