> To be fair, the 5.5 situation without pulling in ZO+ is NOT the same as 5.4 > was. Today, right now, there exists at least one stable open source opcode > cache. 5.4 had none for many months after release. So I'm not sure if the > same pressures exist.
If you are referring to APC as the stable cache, that unfortunately is not entirely correct, it is still relatively easy to crash APC unless some work-arounds are applied. I was speaking to a several people at the conference just yesterday and they were indicating frequent crashes with APC, the work-arounds appear to have solved their issues, but those are not exactly obvious. > The discussion now is if we delay 5.5 to spend the time pulling it in core. > But either way (in core or not), ZO+ is open and working on 5.5 alpha. So we > could skip the core import, and just ship it today as gold, and it would be > adoptable straight away (unlike how 5.4 was). Well the question around the delay, is what is the negative consequence of the delay, versus the advantage of having a built-in opcode cache shipped as part of 5.5 which is likely to give many people an impetuous to upgrade from their current 5.2/5.3 install. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
