Stas, how does it look with this one? Please let me know whether it's ok for 5.4. I would go with master otherwise.
Thanks Anatol On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 19:13 +0200, Anatol Belski wrote: > Stas, > > I've invested more time and here's almost cleaned up patch > > http://belski.net/phpz/finfo/finfo_5.14_10.patch.gz > > The tests pass, valgrind is happy, as well Windows. I've noticed no > behaviour change, except - as the data is updated and one might see > different (eventually better) results. > > Please take a look. > > Regards > > Anatol > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 22:09 +0100, David Soria Parra wrote: > > On 03/27/2013 09:35 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > > > We have done that many times in the past for 5.3 and 5.4. It is > > > relatively risk free. Even more for 5.5 during beta phase. It does not > > > add new features but fixes bugs. > > > > > > The good side effect is that we can test it well with 5.5 and back > > > port to 5.3/4 later. > > > > I consider it a feature and not a necessary bugfix. In addition anatoly > > is saying that there are still problems with the patch. Both are reasons > > for me to believe that upgrading it 1-1.5 month before a final is not > > worth the risk. I would prefer to be more strict about the "feature > > freeze" than we were with 5.3 and 5.4. > > > > David > > > > > > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
