It wouldn’t have been the first time that something that seems common sense, suddenly becomes controversial a few years later J Better safe than sorry.
I made some changes to the phrasing of the final paragraph in this section (please review and make sure you’re good with it) – I think the list you added is great. Thanks, Zeev *From:* Nikita Popov [mailto:nikita....@gmail.com] *Sent:* Saturday, June 08, 2013 3:54 PM *To:* Zeev Suraski *Cc:* Dmitry Stogov; PHP internals *Subject:* Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Internal operator overloading and GMP improvements On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: I would add that the purpose of this feature would be exclusive to extensions that implement mathematical concepts, where the operators are well defined. In other words, arbitrary precision math, vectors, matrices, etc. - yes; Incrementing or decrementing a picture object to change the white balance - no. This seems like common sense... But just to be sure I added a note (and your example) at the end of the https://wiki.php.net/rfc/operator_overloading_gmp#applications_of_operator_overloadingsection :) Nikita
