On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com>wrote:
> Hi! > > > If there is no more feedback on the RFC, then I'll start voting in a day > or > > two. > > I would suggest splitting this RFC into two - the operator overloading > one and the GMP one. Converting GMP to objects has little to do with > overloading (even if needed for GMP to benefit from it) so I think it > would be better to treat them separately. > My main interest here is improving the usability of GMP - the operator overloading is just a means to that goal. With that in mind, I think it makes little sense to land just the addition of overloading, but leave the GMP changes out. That's why I'm doing them both in one :) Hope that makes some sense ^^ Nikita
