On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Xinchen Hui <larue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey: > > > > I really don't like arguing in english, so this will be my last > > reply in this thread. > > > > sorry to bother you, and my "backlash" wasn't really targeted you > personally. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uniform_variable_syntax > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/size_t_and_int64_next > > > > aren't they discussed and voted? what do you mean by we can't even > > start in previous comment? > > yes, and both of those were put on hold by the authors until the phpng > situation is resolved, and to me it feels wrong to block something which is > done and accepted with something which is not-yet finished(albeit it seems > to be reaching a stable state) and didn't have a consensus behind it. > To make sure that this isn't misconstrued as an argument against merging phpng: My work isn't blocked by phpng (it's actually based on it), it's blocked by lack of an official decision regarding phpng. I have another large patch (AST) based on phpng and Andrea is working on a bigint implementation, also based on phpng. Before these things can move forward we need the decision that PHP 6/7 is going to be based on phpng. Nikita
