any one may vote according to their thoughts I'm not going to persuade any one. I already know the opinion of the majority.
Unfortunately, now many people lessen to the guys who speaks a lot. I was never able to do it :), but ... look into results we provide. They are more expressive than any words. Thanks. Dmitry, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: > >> one week - two weeks - months - years. >> I'll wait. >> I know what I'm doing. I'll make it. >> >> Dmitry. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Jul 24, 2014 10:13 PM, "Dmitry Stogov" <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > agree, >> > > >> > > I just don't see any blockers, except for Pierre. >> > >> > Come on Dmitry, I am not the only who has asked that. >> > >> > > Just to throw in my usual two-cents, it seems to me that this RFC is very > premature. It's the same sort of over-eagerness I saw in the front-page > news post a few weeks back. I understand what you guys are trying to > accomplish and I applaud you for it, but as far as I can see, it's still > quite a ways away from being ready for prime time. And yet, you seem to be > acting like it's already there. > > Aside from the code needing to be ready/tested, you also need to have a > more matured collaboration with community folks outside your project like > Pierre, which at the moment appears to be downright hostile. Even if the > code looked great and everything else was in place, I would never vote to > switch over to such a drastic new schema when there's this much animosity > and controversy surrounding it. I keep reading complaints about questions > being ignored and conflicting stories about secrecy and process. I also > think there's some merit to the concern raised about the ambiguity being a > prelude to patches being rejected over trivial concerns. > > I think you guys need to slow down and mend a few fences if you want to > make this happen. As much as I like the goals of this project, I'm forced > to vote -1 for now, as well. I just think you're jumping the gun when > there are too many unanswered questions/concerns still out there. > > --Kris > >
