On Sep 21, 2014 10:48 AM, "Xinchen Hui" <larue...@php.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sep 21, 2014 10:08 AM, "Xinchen Hui" <larue...@php.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 21 Sep 2014, at 03:52, Xinchen Hui <larue...@php.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hey: > >> >> > >> >> it should be closed tomorrow, not today. > >> > > >> > It's the 21st in my timezone. I started the vote at 2am on the 14th and > >> > it's now 4am on the 21st. I don't see a problem. > >> > >> the problem is, you only get 16:8 on today. and it's weekend. > >> > >> that means your RFC is not very common acceptable. (I have strong > >> objection on it). > >> > >> and it's weekend, so, it's better to wait one day more.. > >> > >> anyway, I see you already commit your patch... which is not very good. > >> > > > > I did not manage to vote while being on the road. But I am +1. So consider > > it as, theoretically, 17:8. > why you didn't? > > there are lot's of people didn't vote. so how to count theirs vote? > > (please if you have opinion.. then vote)
It is closed now. > > > > However the nitpicking about votes periods, % and co is getting annoying. I > > will see if we can clarify that. To use all possible ways to block or push > > RFCs is getting counter productive and produce a bad experience. > > and nervemind. I respect the RFC process, even I don't like this RFC :-) > thanks > > > > Cheers, > > Pierre > > > > -- > Xinchen Hui > @Laruence > http://www.laruence.com/
