On Dec 26, 2014 4:58 AM, "Stanislav Malyshev" <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > At the very least that sounds like a less intrusive step, as methods and > > classes are usually already written "correctly". > > To me, it sounds like needless nuisance - the code works, but wastes > time to produce warnings that nobody reads. If your have a code that > relies on autoloaders and case mix breaks it, your autoloading code can > take care of it and produce whatever handling you need (from log > messages up to bailing out). But if you have the code that uses mixed > case and it works for you, these warnings would do nothing - they'd just > be ignored and we'd hurt performance and achieve nothing.
My point too. I was only referring to the options for the RFC.
