On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, François Laupretre <franc...@php.net> > wrote: > > Once again, anyone can take over version 0.3, if it is so great. Why > don't you do it ? > > I will play the game, stop working on my proposal, and vote 'yes' again. > > But don't ask me to do it in your place. > > > If nobody else does it, I will. > > I think Andrea's 0.3 proposal was extremely well balanced, served > everyone's needs whether they would admit it or not, and who's only > failing (subjectively termed) was the use of declare(). I think > declare() is fine and not nearly as ugly as some have slandered it to > be, but I'm willing to read the winds and modify it for v0.4. > > Straw poll: > 1) <?php strict; > 2) <?php-strict > 3) use strict; (psuedo-namespace) > 3) <?php // strict (I don't actually like HHVM's style, but if you do...) > 4) declare(strict=true); (As a top-level declare only) > 5) declare(strict=true); (exactly as in v0.3 -- maybe you liked it) > 6) your write-in vote here > > I'm not going to scope in union types, nullables, or falsables. We > can leave that for a followup RFC, this one is contentious enough as > it is. > Thank you for taking over. I like "use strict" and "declare as top-level only" most. The "<?php strict" variants feel too ad-hoc. Nikita
