I'm not sure. Currently we don't use namespaces for core classes, but I won't object to change this. Nikita, what do you think?
Thanks. Dmitry. On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Trevor Suarez <ric...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think that naming the new parent exception something like "Throwable" or >> "Catchable" (as Nikita previously suggested) would be a bit more concise >> in >> meaning than "BaseException". You may not have even meant that name as a >> formal proposal, but I figured I'd weigh in regardless. :P >> > > I think they probably should use namespace... > > Regards, > > -- > Yasuo Ohgaki > yohg...@ohgaki.net >
