So sticking to the rules is now "playing law firm". The RFC Andreea proposed has been modified several times before going to vote. And we're not voting on her RFC, we're voting on Bob's that was proposed 2 days ago.
I have a feeling that this will go to vote tomorrow though. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com < guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote: > And none answered me... is this RFC gonna be allowed to enter on voting > phase for 7.0 or not? > > This drastically changes my voted on STH v5 which ends EOD today. > > []s, > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Stelian Mocanita <steli...@php.net> > wrote: > >> Zeev, allow me to understand how this goes. Bob's discussions on the RFC >> started 2 days ago. Based on the current rules, the RFC can only go to >> vote >> after 2 weeks. That means in 12 days starting now. >> >> So we are either violating the RFC rules by pushing the vote tomorrow or >> we're >> delaying PHP7 for another 2 weeks maybe yet another TH RFC passes? >> >> Pointing at number 6 from https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > On Mar 14, 2015 9:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" <z...@zend.com> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Maybe I was naïve, but I thought I had a better way to make both weak >> & >> > > strict camps happy, >> > >> > By dropping strict despite all discussions, proposing a pandara box rfc >> by >> > changing the casting rules and now suddenly proposing to go vote to yet >> > another "perfect" RFC? Sorry, it does not help anyone and damages php, >> > creates yet more issues. This is not a good call. >> > >> > > > > -- > Guilherme Blanco > MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com > GTalk: guilhermeblanco > Toronto - ON/Canada >
