Hi, On 13 March 2015 at 23:48, Arvids Godjuks <arvids.godj...@gmail.com> wrote: > And actually, I would plea for a moment of sanity right now. > > As far as i'm concerned - the RM for the 7.0 had to step in a long time ago > and said "guys, I do not accept any typehint proposals into the 7.0 > release, work it out and come back for 7.1". > Because if this would be a commercial development before a release - > feature would be scrapped and re-sheduled for later release. > Why? Because the clusterf**k happened at RFC level already, the development > itself is going to be haisty considering the timeline and definetly being > bombarded by the protesters, countless critisism and so on. It is going to > affect the projects. And that is a bad thing. Look past the damn typehint > RFC's and just try to asses the big picture. Right now it's a tunnel vision > for many on the list.
This has been under discussion for a really long time and putting it off is unlikely to substantially change the outcome. The current RFCs went to vote within the allowed timeline for PHP7. What you are basically saying is that the entire PHP 7 timeline is flawed. If that's the case then you should be arguing for the PHP7 timing to be changed, if you feel that any RFC will need additional development time, not for the typehinting RFCs to all be withdrawn. Paddy -- Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.survivethedeepend.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
