On 1/9/16 5:03 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > Hi Stas, > > Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> This seems useful. I do wonder whether we should use by default for >>> RFCs. It's interesting to see how different people vote, and knowing >>> who >> >> I think we talked about it, and decided not to do it. Anything changed? > > Actually, I don't think so. My fear was probably unfounded.
Has this discussion happened since the STH votes happened? I know it's been discussed before, but it seems that the STH vote kinda brought this out of the woodwork a bit. And honestly I haven't seen a serious discussion about 'by default anonymous' since that time. (But perhaps I missed it) Eli -- | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
