Le 12/05/2016 à 19:33, Sara Golemon a écrit :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rfc.third-party-editing
Let's make RFCs more useful before AND after voting!
-Sara
As RFC author, what should I do with irrelevant arguments against my RFC
? Should I add a reply ? More generally, I don't like the idea that
anybody else can add anything to my RFC.
I agree that, ideally, the reactions of the ML should be summarized
somewhere but the question is : WHO will summarize ? Ideally, we would
need an independant 3rd party, but we don't have it. So, the best
solution, IMO, is still to let the author summarize the ML discussion in
his RFC.
Regards
François
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
