On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:33 AM Zeev Suraski <vsura...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've also given several examples - some of them arguably quite bigger than > this proposal - where we sat on code for a very long time (multiple years > even) in order for it to be included in a major version, and not a minor > one (phpng, JIT, FFI) even though technically they could go into the next > available minor. > Hi, I'm trying to understand this argument better but there is something I'm missing. Why would a feature like JIT (which would be transparent to the user AFAIK) need to wait for a major other than marketing reasons? Sorry in advance for the slightly off-topic question. Regards, Pedro
