On Tue, Sep 24, 2019, 3:11 PM Christian Schneider <cschn...@cschneid.com> wrote:
> > So here is my question: Am I the only one who thinks BC breaks should be > fully covered in an RFC before voting? > If I am not mistaken this is the rule yes. A specific section should exist to list BC breaks. Also a BC break is not allowed in minor versions. The question is also about what is a BC break, f.e is changing error level a BC break? or the return value on error? I am in favour of more strict BC rules for minor versions, but this is a tricky topic. Best,
