On 17 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2006-08-17, Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You could consider Perl. > > If I wanted a strongly timebomb-typed language, I'd probably use Lua. > But I don't think timebomb typing should be used for largeish projects, > especially not ones that one should be able to depend on, although > strong timebomb typing can be quite nice for small hacky stuff.
I think the term "timebomb" reveals a lot of bias. But that, of course, is your prerogative. I'll just point out that Perl modules hide complexity and can enforce strong types, if that's what you need. > Anyway, I'm not about to switch language or start a new Ion-like project > right now; this has all been hypothetical for me. Sure. Ted
