On Feb 25, 2010, at 4:27 PM, [email protected] wrote: > <words about duplication of work>
No kidding. This is reason #1 why I'm trying to get all this shit into an svn repo, even if it is a fork, it will at least be a local fork as opposed to the forks scattered all over google code/sourceforge/etc > No offense, but spending effort and especially money on a website > redesign? Programmers don't care about that--as long as they can find > ioq3 in a google search for "quake 3 mobile" or "quake 3 arm" or something > of the sort, I'm sure they'll find their way to the mailing list and SVN. > All the needed information is accessible on the website, not sure why you > think it's horrible. The current ioquake3.org website is only vaguely navigable if you know what you're looking for and you know what /I/ would have called it. Programmers might not care about it, but I care about it, and programmers will find what they want quicker with a new site than they do now. This is the same attitude that fosters the generally shitty (and well-deserved!) end-user reputation of Linux. _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
