Probably those in school are dealing with finals. But hey, stuff goes in fits and starts! One day nothing the next day BAM VOIP, so who knows.
As for will anyone do anything, who knows. I'm only hoping for stuff like Ben's comments about why a certain approach might not work and an alternative approach that might work, how much of a pain it would be to implement, etc. That's why I threw it on the ioq3 wiki. So people could freely edit and clarify and add ideas and comment, etc. All I'm hoping for at this point is some type of plan that would make sense in the context of ioq3 and address some of the compatibility objections that have popped up from time to time. Something that some of the prime committers like angst, timbo, thilo, etc. would find acceptable enough to want to include in the main source. Otherwise, there's no point since the effort would just be another source fork to wither and die. I figure a solid plan in place with the blessing of the committers would at least improve the odds of someone wanting to try implementation at some point in the future. So the more comments on the technical feasibility, the better! > ok, will anyone do anything, practically? 'cause the project seems > inactive lately. > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Zachary <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On May 2, 2010, at 1:01 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> ioq3 should be the one-stop shop for most projects starting off. >> >> Yep. _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
