iod3 is on the horizon? Uh oh. :D

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 07:31:05PM -0600, [email protected] wrote:
> > An issue might be that people await for Doom3/Next id software GPL
> > release and may be afraid whatever such effort may by put to waste by
> > 'ooh, shiny, forget ioq3, jump into iod3'.
> 
> I agree that may be an issue but I think that Q3 was far more popular with
> players and mod teams than Doom 3.  The "feel" of the engine just... it
> wasn't the same.  If the graphics are basically the same I can see people
> preferring ioq3 due to the feel.  Hell, even without the graphics I think
> there were (and are) more Q3-based players still out there than Doom
> 3-based players.
> 
> I haven't actually looked that up but I really wouldn't be shocked if that
> were the case.
> 
> Monk.
> _______________________________________________
> ioquake3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org
> By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
_______________________________________________
ioquake3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org
By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.

Reply via email to