65k is still a pretty huge library, that?s larger than our current CSDK stack?
From: Othman, Ossama [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 11:06 AM To: Keane, Erich Cc: Light, John J; Lankswert, Patrick; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] glib On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com<mailto:erich.keane at intel.com>> wrote: Since there weren't really any good reasons that anyone mentioned to KEEP Glib, I'm going to start the effort to write a lightweight multi-platform version for it. The CA Layer does a great job abstracting the mutex/thread usage out, so the effort will hopefully not be terribly extensive. Before we reinvent the wheel, has anyone looked at potential lightweight cross-platform alternatives. A quick Web search brings up OpenMP<http://openmp.org/wp/openmp-compilers/>, for example. It appears to be fairly lightweight (e.g. 87K dynamic library and 65K static library for GCC on my Ubuntu 15.04 pre-release box). However, I'm not very familiar with it so I could be wrong about the sizes. -Ossama -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150415/b09f6b37/attachment.html>
