We will post the minutes later, but yes, the project structure that Uze 
presented was approved. We now have a framework for maintainership of the 
port.

Please proceed with reviewing the branch merge.

On ter?a-feira, 28 de junho de 2016 09:11:31 PDT ??? wrote:
> Although I can't join this ISG meeting, thiago or uze can let you know some
> progress after this ISG meeting in this week.
> 
> BR
> 
> Jinguk Jeong
> 
> 
> --------- Original Message ---------
> Sender : Jon A. Cruz <jon at joncruz.org>
> Date : 2016-06-28 17:06 (GMT+9)
> Title : Re: [dev] Review request: merge windows-port to master
> 
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, at 05:59 PM, ??? wrote:
> Dear Antler,
>  
> ISG members are discussing about project policy, now.
> Currently, it is not determined who will be a maintainer, which project
> structure will be the best for supporting several platforms, ... Plz wait
> some more time before merging to master.
>  
> BR
>  
> Jinguk Jeong 
>  
> Has there been any progress on this front? Other changes are starting to get
> backed up waiting on this, as we are accumulating more and more engineering
> debt the longer we wait. 
> --
> Jon A. Cruz
> jon at joncruz.org
>  
> _______________________________________________
> iotivity-dev mailing list
> iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev


-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to