On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:11:56PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On ter?a-feira, 8 de mar?o de 2016 17:04:25 PST Otavio Pontes wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I am working in the OIC implementation of Soletta library and I realized > > that the tinydtls library imported in iotivity repository has some > > patches applied to it, adding important features used by iotivity > > security, such as dtls_enables_anon_ecdh function. > > > > Is there any plan to have those patches applied upstream? Or a plan to > > maintain a public fork of tinydtls, outside of the iotivity repository, > > compatible with OIC requirements? I saw that there is one branch called > > iotivity in tinydtls repository, but the patches needed are not > > committed to that branch too. > > The patches need to be upstreamed, we need to drop our copy and we need to > upgrade to the latest upstream. > > Anything else is not acceptable. > > PS: on the tinydtls licence, we had a confusion of which licence(s) applied. > It turns out that it's dual-licensed under both the EPL and the EDL. The > latter licence is compatible with our needs. >
Thiago is there a date when it will be done ? It's pretty hard keep compatibility with Iotivity due those local patches. Also this will always be a nightmare when we need to update to the latest tinytdls upstream. Is someone responsible for this task or we should also ask the patch authors to do this ? -- Flavio Ceolin Intel Open source Technology Center
