On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:44:27PM -0300, Otavio Pontes wrote: > On 03/08/2016 05:37 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >On ter?a-feira, 8 de mar?o de 2016 17:32:53 PST Flavio Ceolin wrote: > >>>PS: on the tinydtls licence, we had a confusion of which licence(s) > >>>applied. It turns out that it's dual-licensed under both the EPL and the > >>>EDL. The latter licence is compatible with our needs. > >>> > >>> > >>Thiago is there a date when it will be done ? It's pretty hard keep > >>compatibility with Iotivity due those local patches. Also this will always > >>be a > >>nightmare when we need to update to the latest tinytdls upstream. > >> > >>Is someone responsible for this task or we should also ask the patch > >>authors to do this ? > >There is no date and no one is assigned responsibility yet. > > > >I would say that each patch author needs to assume responsibility. And we > >should set a deadline, after which patches not upstreamed will be silently > >dropped. > > It sounds like a good approach to me.
Yep, it is fair :) -- Flavio Ceolin Intel Open source Technology Center
