On ter?a-feira, 8 de mar?o de 2016 17:32:53 PST Flavio Ceolin wrote: > > PS: on the tinydtls licence, we had a confusion of which licence(s) > > applied. It turns out that it's dual-licensed under both the EPL and the > > EDL. The latter licence is compatible with our needs. > > > > > > Thiago is there a date when it will be done ? It's pretty hard keep > compatibility with Iotivity due those local patches. Also this will always > be a > nightmare when we need to update to the latest tinytdls upstream. > > Is someone responsible for this task or we should also ask the patch > authors to do this ?
There is no date and no one is assigned responsibility yet. I would say that each patch author needs to assume responsibility. And we should set a deadline, after which patches not upstreamed will be silently dropped. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
