I second Gabriel's opinion. I think with the current design it drains out the battery too fast. This can be one of the reasons.
Thanks, Ashwini On 27 May 2016 14:16, "Schulhof, Gabriel" <gabriel.schulhof at intel.com> wrote: > Hey! > > To clarify with an example: > > libuv provides two public APIs: > int uv_backend_fd(...); > int uv_backend_timeout(...); > > If iotivity were to implement something similar, then those two functions > together would inform the application when it was time to call OCProcess(), > and how far in the future OCProcess() needed to be executed again. > > Cheers! > > > > Gabriel > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160531/8474090a/attachment.html>
