Dear developers Please find the notes from last Monday's ISG call.
Also, as noted, we'd like to have further discussion on the structure of the IoTivity project. Please find attached the beginning of said discussion. The organisation of the source code into Projects and subsystems is up to the developers working in them, so treat the attachment as a suggestion. Uze will post a different suggestion. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [isg] Notes from ISG call 2017-04-10/11 Date: segunda-feira, 10 de abril de 2017, 16:44:23 PDT From: Macieira, Thiago <[email protected]> To: isg at lists.iotivity.org <isg at lists.iotivity.org> IoTivity Steering Group meeting 2017-04-10 Attendees: * Kathleen * Thiago * Valerie * Uze * Dwarka * Omar * MJ Jeong * Kyeongwoon Lee * IoTivity Governance * Concerns from Samsung * Does this create more work for Project Leaders? More meetings to attend? * Is this the correct project organisation? For example, how does Constrained and Node show up? * Next steps: * Thiago will post current proposal for discussion among developers * Uze will post counter-proposal with different project/subcommittee setup * IoTivity API * Lots of confusion between what?s public and what?s private API * ISG did approve creation of API Function, but there were no volunteers * Omar will see if he can find a volunteer -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170417/142478f0/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 201703 IoTivity New Governance Details.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 318571 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170417/142478f0/attachment.pdf>
